Why Metrics Matter: Evaluating Policy Choices for Reactive Nitrogen in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Open Access
- 20 September 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Science & Technology
- Vol. 45 (1), 168-174
- https://doi.org/10.1021/es101472z
Abstract
Despite major efforts, the reduction of reactive nitrogen (Nr) using traditional metrics and policy tools for the Chesapeake Bay has slowed in recent years. In this article, we apply the concept of the Nitrogen Cascade to the chemically dynamic nature and multiple sources of Nr to examine the temporal and spatial movement of different forms of Nr through multiple ecosystems and media. We also demonstrate the benefit of using more than the traditional mass fluxes to set criteria for action. The use of multiple metrics provides additional information about where the most effective intervention point might be. Utilizing damage costs or mortality metrics demonstrates that even though the mass fluxes to the atmosphere are lower than direct releases to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, total damage costs to all ecosystems and health are higher because of the cascade of Nr and the associated damages, and because they exact a higher human health cost. Abatement costs for reducing Nr releases into the air are also lower. These findings have major implications for the use of multiple metrics and the additional benefits of expanding the scope of concern beyond the Bay itself and support improved coordination between the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts while restoring the Chesapeake Bay.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regional Air Quality: Local and Interstate Impacts of NOx and SO2 Emissions on Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter in the Eastern United StatesEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2007
- The benefits and costs of reducing emissions from the electricity sectorJournal of Environmental Management, 2007
- Integrated Assessment Modeling of Atmospheric Pollutants in the Southern Appalachian Mountains: Part II. Fine Particulate Matter and VisibilityJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2006
- Nonlinear Response of Ozone to Emissions: Source Apportionment and Sensitivity AnalysisEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2005
- Integrated Assessment Modeling of Atmospheric Pollutants in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Part I: Hourly and Seasonal OzoneJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2005
- Nonlinearity in atmospheric response: A direct sensitivity analysis approachJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2004
- The Nitrogen CascadeBioScience, 2003
- Integrated modeling for air quality assessment: The Southern Appalachians Mountains initiative projectJournal de Physique IV, 2002
- Development of a comprehensive, multiscale “one-atmosphere” modeling system: application to the Southern Appalachian MountainsAtmospheric Environment, 2002
- Grandfathering and coal plant emissions: the cost of cleaning up the Clean Air ActEnergy Policy, 1999