Grade targets and teaching innovations
- 31 October 2001
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Economics of Education Review
- Vol. 20 (5), 485-493
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7757(00)00019-4
Abstract
This paper develops a simple model of student choice to explain why some teaching innovations have only a negligible effect on mean student performance. Teaching innovations are defined as small changes in pedagogy that enable students to more quickly convert time to knowledge. In modeling student behavior it is assumed that some students are more interested in their level of performance or in minimizing their effort than in mastering a subject. The model demonstrates that if students set grade targets, some students choose to learn less and the change in mean student achievement will tend to be small.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997
- TEACHING TOOLS: TEACHING METHODS IN UNDERGRADUATE ECONOMICSEconomic Inquiry, 1995
- HOW MANY PAYCHECKS? AN EXAMPLE OF A SELF-IMPOSED CONSTRAINTEconomic Inquiry, 1994
- Giffen Goods, the Survival Imperative, and the Irish Potato CultureJournal of Political Economy, 1994
- FOCUSING THE SEARCH FOR GIFFEN BEHAVIOREconomic Inquiry, 1994
- MORE ON THE SEARCH FOR GIFFEN GOODSEconomic Inquiry, 1994
- Do Individual Retirement Accounts Increase Savings?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991
- IN SEARCH OF GIFFEN BEHAVIOREconomic Inquiry, 1991
- Motivation and individual differences in learning: An integration of developmental, differential and cognitive perspectivesLearning and Individual Differences, 1990
- An Empirical Indifference Function for Income and LeisureThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1978