Vulnerability to poverty: an empirical comparison of alternative measures
- 1 April 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Applied Economics
- Vol. 45 (12), 1493-1506
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.624271
Abstract
This article compares empirically the several measures of individual vulnerability to poverty proposed in the literature, in order to understand which is the best signal of poverty that can be used for policy purposes. To this aim, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients are used as precision criteria. The results show that two groups of indexes can be identified, high and low performers, and, among the former, that proposed by Dutta et al. ( 2011 Dutta, I . 2011. Foster, J. and Mishra, A., On measuring vulnerability to poverty, Social Choice and Welfare, 37, 743–61 [Google Scholar] ) is the most precise.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vulnerability and poverty dynamics in VietnamApplied Economics, 2011
- Consumption smoothing and vulnerability in RussiaApplied Economics, 2010
- Vulnerability and Poverty in BangladeshSSRN Electronic Journal, 2009
- Measuring VulnerabilityThe Economic Journal, 2003
- Economic mobility and poverty dynamics in developing countriesThe Journal of Development Studies, 2000
- A Class of Decomposable Poverty MeasuresEconometrica, 1984
- The Maximum Likelihood and the Nonlinear Three-Stage Least Squares Estimator in the General Nonlinear Simultaneous Equation ModelEconometrica, 1977