New chemosensory component in the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES): first-year results for measured olfactory dysfunction
Top Cited Papers
- 10 June 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Vol. 17 (2), 221-240
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-016-9364-1
Abstract
The U.S. NHANES included chemosensory assessments in the 2011–2014 protocol. We provide an overview of this protocol and 2012 olfactory exam findings. Of the 1818 NHANES participants aged ≥40 years, 1281 (70.5 %) completed the exam; non-participation mostly was due to time constraints. Health technicians administered an 8-item, forced-choice, odor identification task scored as normosmic (6–8 odors identified correctly) versus olfactory dysfunction, including hyposmic (4–5 correct) and anosmic/severe hyposmic (0–3 correct). Interviewers recorded self-reported smell alterations (during past year, since age 25, phantosmia), histories of sinonasal problems, xerostomia, dental extractions, head or facial trauma, and chemosensory-related treatment and changes in quality of life. Olfactory dysfunction was found in 12.4 % (13.3 million adults; 55 % males/45 % females) including 3.2 % anosmic/severe hyposmic (3.4 million; 74 % males/26 % females). Selected age-specific prevalences were 4.2 % (40–49 years), 12.7 % (60–69 years), and 39.4 % (80+ years). Among adults ≥70 years, misidentification rates for warning odors were 20.3 % for smoke and 31.3 % for natural gas. The highest sensitivity (correctly identifying dysfunction) and specificity (correctly identifying normosmia) of self-reported olfactory alteration was among anosmics/severe hyposmics (54.4 % and 78.1 %, respectively). In age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression analysis, risk factors of olfactory dysfunction were racial/ethnic minority, income-to-poverty ratio ≤ 1.1, education <high school, and heavy drinking. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity reduced risk of impairment. Olfactory dysfunction is prevalent, particularly among older adults. Inexpensive, brief odor identification tests coupled with questions (smell problems past year, since age 25, phantosmia) could screen for marked dysfunction. Healthcare providers should be prepared to offer education on non-olfactory avoidance of hazardous events.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (Y1-DC-0013, Y1-DC-0013)
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
This publication has 87 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevalence of Subjective Olfactory Dysfunction and Its Risk Factors: Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyPLOS ONE, 2013
- Genetic and environmental influences on odor identification ability in the very old.Psychology and Aging, 2011
- Evolution of Functionally Diverse Alleles Associated with PTC Bitter Taste Sensitivity in AfricaMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2011
- Olfactory Impairment in an Adult Population: The Beaver Dam Offspring StudyChemical Senses, 2011
- Olfactory impairment in older adults: Five‐year incidence and risk factorsThe Laryngoscope, 2011
- Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and likingPhysiology & Behavior, 2010
- Reliability of Threshold and Suprathreshold Methods for Taste Phenotyping: Characterization with PROP and Sodium ChlorideChemosensory Perception, 2009
- Assessment of Sensory Function in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging ProjectThe Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2009
- Test-Retest Reliability of the San Diego Odor Identification Test and Comparison with the Brief Smell Identification TestChemical Senses, 2009
- Prevalence of Olfactory Dysfunction: The Skövde Population‐Based StudyThe Laryngoscope, 2004