Can Innovations in Rail Freight Transhipment Be Successful?
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Transport Reviews
- Vol. 27 (1), 103-122
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640600765091
Abstract
The central place of transhipment in rail transport solutions and the lack of successful innovations is the focus in this paper. Based on a questionnaire and interviews, several conclusions can be drawn. First, the respondents value the product characteristics of the different innovations as neutral. However, there appear to be a number of ways to make the innovations more attractive (e.g. reduce uncertainty/risks, increase the compatibility and decrease the complexity). Second, the respondents value the user requirements of the innovations concerned as neutral. However, several different opportunities can be identified to make the innovations more attractive on the user requirements side (e.g. flexibility). Third, concerning the user requirements, the costs of the innovations are perceived as high. This probably is one of the major barriers to the successful adoption of the innovations in the rail transhipment market. In this market, costs are very important and cannot always be recovered through charging higher prices. A last conclusion is that user requirements can be analysed from two points of view: first, the user of the innovation is the terminal operator and the innovation must meet his criteria; and second, the actual user is the rail transport company (and ultimately the shipper of the freight). The innovations are then evaluated on their increase in performance for the total intermodal transport solution.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of Potentially Successful Barge InnovationsTransport Reviews, 2005
- Quality function deployment: A literature reviewEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2002
- A unified mixed logit framework for modeling revealed and stated preferences: formulation and application to congestion pricing analysis in the San Francisco Bay areaTransportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2002
- Intermodal freight terminals: an analysis of the terminal marketTransportation Planning and Technology, 1999
- Optimal size and location planning of public logistics terminalsTransportation Research. Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, 1999
- Appraisal of investments in European nodal centres for goods – freight villages: A comparative analysisTransportation, 1999
- Quality function deployment (QFD) — A means for developing usable productsInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1996
- From missing networks to interoperable networksTransport Policy, 1995
- Service-cost tradeoffs for carload freight traffic in the U.S. rail industryTransportation Research Part A: General, 1991
- Diffusion, uncertainty and firm sizeInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 1989