Cesarean Delivery and the Risk–Benefit Calculus
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in The New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 356 (9), 885-888
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp068290
Abstract
In 1937, an article in the Journal describing 10 years of births at Boston City Hospital revealed an overall rate of cesarean delivery of about 3%.1 Recently released 2005 data on cesarean deliveries show that contemporary rates are 10 times as high, having climbed above 30% (see graph ).2 Indeed, of the 20th century's many changes in obstetrical care — the wholesale move from home to hospital delivery, increasing use of anesthesia, the advent of in vitro fertilization — few have generated more attention and debate or had a greater effect on the process of delivery than this seemingly inexorable rise.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vaginal Delivery after Cesarean Section — Is the Risk Acceptable?The New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasoundJAMA, 1996
- Relationship between malpractice claims and cesarean deliveryJAMA, 1993
- Cesarean SectionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1937