A predictive model for the early identification of patients at risk for a prolonged intensive care unit length of stay
Open Access
- 13 May 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Vol. 10 (1), 27
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-27
Abstract
Patients with a prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay account for a disproportionate amount of resource use. Early identification of patients at risk for a prolonged length of stay can lead to quality enhancements that reduce ICU stay. This study developed and validated a model that identifies patients at risk for a prolonged ICU stay. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 343,555 admissions to 83 ICUs in 31 U.S. hospitals from 2002-2007. We examined the distribution of ICU length of stay to identify a threshold where clinicians might be concerned about a prolonged stay; this resulted in choosing a 5-day cut-point. From patients remaining in the ICU on day 5 we developed a multivariable regression model that predicted remaining ICU stay. Predictor variables included information gathered at admission, day 1, and ICU day 5. Data from 12,640 admissions during 2002-2005 were used to develop the model, and the remaining 12,904 admissions to internally validate the model. Finally, we used data on 11,903 admissions during 2006-2007 to externally validate the model. The variables that had the greatest impact on remaining ICU length of stay were those measured on day 5, not at admission or during day 1. Mechanical ventilation, PaO2: FiO2 ratio, other physiologic components, and sedation on day 5 accounted for 81.6% of the variation in predicted remaining ICU stay. In the external validation set observed ICU stay was 11.99 days and predicted total ICU stay (5 days + day 5 predicted remaining stay) was 11.62 days, a difference of 8.7 hours. For the same patients, the difference between mean observed and mean predicted ICU stay using the APACHE day 1 model was 149.3 hours. The new model's r2 was 20.2% across individuals and 44.3% across units. A model that uses patient data from ICU days 1 and 5 accurately predicts a prolonged ICU stay. These predictions are more accurate than those based on ICU day 1 data alone. The model can be used to benchmark ICU performance and to alert physicians to explore care alternatives aimed at reducing ICU stay.This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Electronic Health Records in U.S. HospitalsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- An Introduction to Statistical Methods Used in Binary Outcome ModelingSeminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2008
- The association between nighttime transfer from the intensive care unit and patient outcome*Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- Prolonged acute mechanical ventilation, hospital resource utilization, and mortality in the United StatesCritical Care Medicine, 2008
- Impact of a clinical pharmacist-enforced intensive care unit sedation protocol on duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay*Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- The impact of different prognostic models and their customization on institutional comparison of intensive care units*Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- Survival After Prolonged Length of Stay in a Trauma Intensive Care UnitThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2007
- Recalibration of risk prediction models in a large multicenter cohort of admissions to adult, general critical care units in the United Kingdom*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- What’s in a day? Determining intensive care unit length of stayCritical Care Medicine, 2000
- The Chronic Ventilator-Dependent Unit: A Lower-Cost Alternative to Intensive CareMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2000