Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands
- 1 December 1980
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 74 (4), 905-916
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1954312
Abstract
That many different officials contribute in many different ways to decisions and policies in the modern state makes it difficult to ascribe moral responsibility to any official. The usual responses to this problem—based on concepts of hierarchical and collective responsibility—distort the notion of responsibility. The idea of personal responsibility—based on causal and volitional criteria—constitutes a better approach to the problem of ascribing responsibility to public officials. Corresponding to each of these criteria are types of excuses that officials use in defending the decisions they make. An analysis of the conditions under which the excuses eliminate or mitigate responsibility provides a foundation for accountability in a democracy.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Symbolic protest and calculated silencePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1991
- Ethical Dilemmas and the Education of PolicymakersThe Journal of Higher Education, 1982
- The Place of Principles in Policy AnalysisAmerican Political Science Review, 1979
- PUBLIC AND PRIVATE MORALITYPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1978
- Can investigations improve scientific advice? The case of the ABMMinerva, 1972
- Are Bureaucracies Important? (Or Allison Wonderland)Foreign Policy, 1972
- Doing and DeservingHarvard Law Review, 1971
- Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a PersonThe Journal of Philosophy, 1971
- Morality and the Ideal of Rationality in Formal OrganizationsMonist, 1970
- Punishment and ResponsibilityUniversity of Toronto Law Journal, 1969