Is physical function a more appropriate measure than volume excess in the assessment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL)?
- 31 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in European Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 39 (15), 2168-2172
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00770-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- UK and USA breast cancer deaths down 25% in year 2000 at ages 20–69 yearsThe Lancet, 2000
- Psychosocial aspects of upper extremity lymphedema in women treated for breast carcinomaCancer, 1998
- Measurement of health-related quality of life of patients receiving conservative treatment for limb lymphoedema using the Nottingham Health ProfileQuality of Life Research, 1997
- The prevalence of arm oedema following treatment for breast cancerQJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Predictors of psychological distress, sexual dysfunction and physical functioning among women with upper extremity lymphedema related to breast cancerPsycho‐Oncology, 1995
- Managing lymphoedemaClinical and Experimental Dermatology, 1995
- The psychological morbidity of breast cancer–related arm swelling. Psychological morbidity of lymphoedemaCancer, 1993
- Evaluation of the results of three different methods of postmastectomy lymphedema treatmentJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1984
- Psychological identification of breast cancer patients before biopsyJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 1982
- Lymphangiosarcoma in postmastectomy lymphedema. A report of six cases in elephantiasis chirurgicaCancer, 1948