Is There Any Time Left for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention According to the 2007 Updated American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Guidelines and the D2B Alliance?
- 7 October 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 52 (15), 1211-1215
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.061
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primary PCI as the preferred reperfusion therapy in STEMI: it is a matter of timeHeart, 2008
- Treatment delays in ST elevation myocardial infarctionBMJ, 2008
- 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial InfarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008
- Hospital Delays in Reperfusion for ST-Elevation Myocardial InfarctionCell Metabolism, 2006
- Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patientsEuropean Heart Journal, 2006
- Hospital Improvement in Time to Reperfusion in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction, 1999 to 2002Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: Does the choice of fibrinolytic agent impact on the importance of time-to-treatment?The American Journal of Cardiology, 2004
- ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction—Executive SummaryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2004
- Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost) everything?The American Journal of Cardiology, 2003
- Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2003