Companion crop performance in the absence and presence of agronomic manipulation
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CSIRO Publishing in Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
- Vol. 58 (7), 690-701
- https://doi.org/10.1071/ar06148
Abstract
A field experiment located in southern New South Wales compared the component yields of cereal–lucerne companion crops (cereals sown into established lucerne) with the yields of cereal and lucerne monocultures. In-crop lucerne herbicide suppression, cereal crop types (wheat and barley), and top-dressed nitrogen (N) were evaluated for the potential to improve cereal production in the presence of lucerne. Plant populations and biomass, cereal grain yields, and grain quality (protein, screenings, and contamination) were measured. Over the 3-year study, cereals sown into established lucerne (4 years of age at the commencement of the experiment) yielded 17% less (P < 0.05) grain than the cereal monoculture. Companion cropping also resulted in a 71% reduction (P < 0.05) in lucerne biomass over the growing season compared with the lucerne monoculture, but a 3-fold (P < 0.05) increase in total (cereal and lucerne) biomass production. There were no differences between wheat and barley crops in the presence of lucerne, although extensive lodging in the 2003-barley monoculture did result in a significant main treatment (+/0 lucerne and +/0 in-crop lucerne suppression) × crop type (wheat and barley) interaction in grain yield, but not cereal biomass. N top-dressed after tillering onto cereal–lucerne companion crops did not increase grain yield, although it did increase cereal biomass in 2003. Whilst in-crop lucerne suppression did not increase cereal grain yields, it did increase (P < 0.05) cereal biomass and reduced lucerne biomass at cereal maturity and contamination (lucerne pods and flowers) of the cereal grain. However, this practice reduced (P < 0.05) lucerne populations, and therefore potentially threatens the longer term viability of lucerne stands so more research is recommended to develop less detrimental strategies for achieving effective in-crop lucerne suppression. This study combined with results from others, suggests that rainfall was a major factor determining cereal responses in the presence of lucerne, and although there were responses in cereal biomass to additional N and herbicide suppression, these strategies appear to only have potential under favourable growing-season conditions.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of grazing and herbicide treatments for lucerne removal before cropping in southern New South WalesAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2005
- Over-cropping lucerne with wheat: effect of lucerne winter activity on total plant production and water use of the mixture, and wheat yield and qualityAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2004
- The Analysis of Designed Experiments and Longitudinal Data by Using Smoothing SplinesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1999
- No-till alfalfa stand termination strategies: Alfalfa control and wheat and barley productionCanadian Journal of Plant Science, 1999
- 'Haying-off', the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertiliser. I. Biomass, grain yield, and water useAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1998
- Lucerne reduces soil moisture and increases livestock production in an area of high groundwater recharge potentialAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1995
- Manipulation of ley pastures with herbicides to control take-allAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1993
- Nitrogen availability from alfalfa suppressed or killed for no‐till productionCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1991
- Effects of forest clearing on groundwaterJournal of Hydrology, 1987
- Effect of grazed lucerne on the moisture status of wheat-growing soilsAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1978