Value of routine follow‐up for patients cured of laryngeal carcinoma
Open Access
- 13 August 2004
- Vol. 101 (6), 1382-1389
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20536
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routine follow‐up offered to patients with laryngeal carcinoma in The Netherlands consisted of 22 routine visits over a time period of 10 years after treatment. The primary aims of the follow‐up were to detect cancer recurrence in asymptomatic patients and to achieve better survival outcome by reducing cancer‐specific mortality rates. METHODS A longitudinal cohort study was performed to evaluate the effect of this follow‐up schedule. Between January 1990 and January 1995, the authors studied all patients with primary laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with intention to cure. For patients who developed cancer recurrence, all routine and extra visits were documented. Reported symptoms and physical evidence of tumor were mapped. RESULTS The patients complied with the follow‐up protocol closely. In only 2% of all routine visits an asymptomatic cancer recurrence was found. There was no difference in survival and tumor mortality rates for patients with and without symptoms, despite the difference in whether the therapy applied had the intention to cure. It seemed that patients who developed tumor recurrence after therapy for laryngeal carcinoma received no benefit from screening for cancer recurrence detection. The lack of benefit for cancer detection screening among asymptomatic patients might be explained by unfavorable tumor biology parameters. CONCLUSIONS The routine follow‐up program after treatment for laryngeal carcinoma did not lead to survival benefit for asymptomatic patients with tumor recurrence. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Screening for Second Primary Lung Cancer After Treatment of Laryngeal CancerThe Laryngoscope, 2002
- Delayed Regional Metastases, Distant Metastases, and Second Primary Malignancies in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Larynx and HypopharynxThe Laryngoscope, 2001
- Realism or nihilism in bowel cancer follow-up?The Lancet, 1998
- Follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal carcinomaDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1995
- Value of routine follow up of women treated for early carcinoma of the breast.BMJ, 1985
- The assessment of lead time and length bias in the evaluation of screening programmesMaturitas, 1985
- Second Primary Respiratory Tract Malignant Neoplasms in Supraglottic CarcinomaJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1981
- ELIMINATION OF “LEAD TIME” BIAS IN ASSESSING THE EFFECT OF EARLY BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1981
- Second primary respiratory tract malignancies in glottic carcinomaCancer, 1980
- Value of outpatient follow-up after curative surgery for carcinoma of the large bowel.BMJ, 1980