The Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings at the Berlin Stock Exchange, 1870–96
- 1 February 2011
- journal article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in German Economic Review
- Vol. 12 (1), 11-32
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2010.00502.x
Abstract
In this article, we evaluate underpricing of initial public offerings at the Berlin Stock Exchange between 1870 and 1896. In contrast to modern data, first-day returns were extraordinary low and averaged less than 5%, even during the speculative period of the early 1870s. Moreover, standard underpricing theories based on asymmetric information, signalling mechanisms or litigation risk cannot explain underpricing. In contrast to modern markets, underpricing was higher during hot issue markets. Finally, we show that cash-flow relevant information contained in the corporate charter was readily factored in the first market price. Thus, the historical capital market differed from today’s market, but seems to have been efficient.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gentlemanly capitalism revisited: a case study of the underpricing of initial public offerings on the London Stock Exchange, 1946–861The Economic History Review, 2009
- Cycles in the IPO marketJournal of Financial Economics, 2008
- Presidential Address: Issuers, Underwriter Syndicates, and Aftermarket TransparencyThe Journal of Finance, 2007
- The Initial Public Offerings of Listed FirmsThe Journal of Finance, 2007
- Is the IPO pricing process efficient?Journal of Financial Economics, 2004
- A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and AllocationsThe Journal of Finance, 2002
- Underwriter Reputation, Initial Returns, and the Long‐Run Performance of IPO StocksThe Journal of Finance, 1998
- The Pricing of Initial Public Offerings: Tests of Adverse-Selection and Signaling TheoriesThe Review of Financial Studies, 1994
- Litigation Risk, Intermediation, and the Underpricing of Initial Public OfferingsThe Review of Financial Studies, 1992
- Signalling by underpricing in the IPO marketJournal of Financial Economics, 1989