A distributed approach for estimating catchment evapotranspiration: comparison of the combination equation and the complementary relationship approaches
- 21 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Hydrological Processes
- Vol. 17 (8), 1509-1523
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1196
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The complementary relationship in estimation of regional evapotranspiration: An enhanced advection‐aridity modelWater Resources Research, 2001
- The complementary relationship in estimation of regional evapotranspiration: The complementary relationship areal evapotranspiration and advection‐aridity modelsWater Resources Research, 2001
- A distributed physical approach for surface-subsurface water transport modeling in agricultural watershedsJournal of Hydrology, 1997
- Modeling Evapotranspiration and Surface Energy Budgets Across a WatershedWater Resources Research, 1996
- Comparison of the Evaporative Fraction and the Priestley‐Taylor α for Parameterizing Daytime EvaporationWater Resources Research, 1996
- On the Concept of Equilibrium Evaporation and the Value of the Priestley‐Taylor CoefficientWater Resources Research, 1996
- Spatial variation in evapotranspiration and the influence of land use on catchment hydrologyJournal of Hydrology, 1995
- Comparison of energy fluxes calculated with the Penman-Monteith equation and the vegetation models SiB and CupidJournal of Hydrology, 1995
- Modelling catchment evaporation: An objective comparison of the Penman and Morton approachesJournal of Hydrology, 1990
- An advection‐aridity approach to estimate actual regional evapotranspirationWater Resources Research, 1979