A qualitative study comparing experiences of the surgical safety checklist in hospitals in high-income and low-income countries
Open Access
- 15 August 2013
- Vol. 3 (8), e003039
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003039
Abstract
Objective Bold claims have been made for the ability of the WHO surgical checklist to reduce surgical morbidity and mortality and improve patient safety regardless of the setting. Little is known about how far the challenges faced by low-income countries are the same as those in high-income countries or different. We aimed to identify and compare the influences on checklist implementation and compliance in the UK and Africa. Design Ethnographic study involving observations, interviews and collection of documents. Thematic analysis of the data. Setting Operating theatres in one African university hospital and two UK university hospitals. Participants 112 h of observations were undertaken. Interviews with 39 theatre and administrative staff were conducted. Results Many staff saw value in the checklist in the UK and African hospitals. Some resentment was present in all settings, linked to conflicts between the philosophy behind the checklist and the realities of local cultural, social and economic contexts. Compliance—involving use, completeness and fidelity—was considerably higher, though not perfect, in the UK settings. In these hospitals, compliance was supported by established structures and systems, and was not significantly undermined by major resource constraints; the same was not true of the low-income context. Hierarchical relationships were a major barrier to implementation in all settings, but were more marked in the low-income setting. Introducing a checklist in a professional environment characterised by a lack of accountability and transparency could make the staff feel jeopardised legally, professionally, and personally, and it encouraged them to make misleading records of what had actually been done. Conclusions Surgical checklist implementation is likely to be optimised, regardless of the setting, when used as a tool in multifaceted cultural and organisational programmes to strengthen patient safety. It cannot be assumed that the introduction of a checklist will automatically lead to improved communication and clinical processes.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical adverse events: a systematic reviewThe American Journal of Surgery, 2013
- Interventional studies for preventing surgical site infections in sub-Saharan Africa – A systematic reviewInternational Journal of Surgery, 2012
- Quality of care in low- and middle-income settings: what next?International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2012
- Barriers to staff adoption of a surgical safety checklistBMJ Quality & Safety, 2011
- Explaining Michigan: Developing an Ex Post Theory of a Quality Improvement ProgramThe Milbank Quarterly, 2011
- Access to emergency and surgical care in sub-Saharan Africa: the infrastructure gapHealth Policy and Planning, 2011
- Interventions to improve teamwork and communications among healthcare staffBritish Journal of Surgery, 2011
- Effect of a Comprehensive Surgical Safety System on Patient OutcomesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Practical challenges of introducing WHO surgical checklist: UK pilot experienceBMJ, 2010
- Improving quality in resource poor settings: observational study from rural RwandaBMJ, 2009