Clinical experience as evidence in evidence‐based practice
- 14 July 2003
- journal article
- website
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 43 (3), 230-237
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02705.x
Abstract
Background. This paper's starting point is the recognition (descriptive not normative) that, for the vast majority of day‐to‐day clinical decision‐making situations, the ‘evidence’ for decision‐making is experiential knowledge. Moreover, reliance on this knowledge base means that nurses must use cognitive shortcuts or heuristics for handling information when making decisions. These heuristics encourage systematic biases in decision‐makers and deviations from the normative rules of ‘good’ decision‐making. Aims. The aim of the paper is to explore three common heuristics and the biases that arise when handling complex information in clinical decision‐making (overconfidence, hindsight and base rate neglect) and, in response to these biases, to illustrate some simple techniques for reducing the negative influence of heuristics. Discussion. Nurses face a limited range of types of uncertainty in their clinical decisions and draw primarily on experiential knowledge to handle these uncertainties. This paper argues that experiential knowledge is a necessary but not sufficient basis for clinical decision‐making. It illustrates how overconfidence in one's knowledge base, being correct ‘after the event’ or with the benefit of hindsight, and ignoring the base rates associated with events, conditions or health states, can impact on professional judgements and decisions. The paper illustrates some simple strategies for minimizing the impact of heuristics on the real‐life clinical decisions of nurses. Conclusion. The paper concludes that more research knowledge of the impact of heuristics and techniques to combat them in nursing decisions is needed.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Attempt to Employ the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale as a “Lab Test” to Trigger Follow-Up in Ambulatory Oncology Clinics: Criterion Validity and DetectionJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2001
- Implementing evidence-based nursing: some misconceptionsEvidence-Based Nursing, 1998
- Which pressure sore risk calculator? A study of the effectiveness of the Norton scale in Hong KongInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 1997
- Hindsight bias among physicians weighing the likelihood of diagnoses.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981
- Training for calibrationOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1980
- Subjective sensitivity analysisOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979
- The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making.American Psychologist, 1979
- Interpretation by Physicians of Clinical Laboratory ResultsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977
- On the psychology of experimental surprises.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977