The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 31 October 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 62 (10), e1-e34
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 100 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant Supplements for Primary and Secondary PreventionJAMA, 2007
- Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysisJAMA, 2006
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004
- Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regressionStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Bayesian random effects meta‐analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scalesStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?Statistics in Medicine, 2002
- Meta‐analyses in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine: comparison of fixed and random effects modelsStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- World Medical Association Declaration of HelsinkiJAMA, 2000