Cost Analysis of Converting from Single-Bundle to Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- 9 February 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 37 (4), 683-687
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508328121
Abstract
Background Recent studies comparing double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction to single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have reported some biomechanical advantages but little or no short-term clinical benefit from the double-bundle technique. In the current healthcare environment, the potential economic implications of widespread conversion to a double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are an important consideration. Purpose To determine the economic implications of widespread use of the double-bundle technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Study Design Economic analysis; Level of evidence, 2. Methods A cost model to assess the effect of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was constructed using standard accounting methodology. The model was based on actual 2008 cost figures (in US dollars) for ligamentous allografts, fixation implants, and operating room time. Revision rate (4%) and time to revision surgery (mean, 4 years) for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was based on the available literature. Assumptions about the prevalence of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the number of grafts used, and the revision rate for double-bundle reconstruction were varied to assess their effect on cost. Results The potential additional cost for widespread conversion to the double-bundle technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction ranges from $36 million to $792 million per year in the United States alone. To offset this increased cost, the double-bundle technique would have to reduce the revision rate at a minimum from 4% to 1.5% and potentially from 24.1% to 0%. Conclusion Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has the potential of adding considerable cost to the healthcare system. Clinical Relevance While further research is warranted to determine if there are other benefits from this technique, widespread adoption of a double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction does not appear to be cost-effective at this time.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primary Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2008
- Results of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament SurgeryThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2007
- Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2007
- Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Quadriceps Tendon-Patellar Bone AutograftArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2006
- Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with nonirradiated fresh-frozen patellar tendon allograftArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2004
- A Randomized Comparison of Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2003
- Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Metaanalysis Comparing Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon AutograftsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2003
- Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in femalesArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2002
- Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with a Reharvested Ipsilateral Patellar TendonThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2001
- Fate of the ACL-injured PatientThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1994