Preference in Random Assignment: Implications for the Interpretation of Randomized Trials
- 12 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
- Vol. 36 (5), 331-342
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-009-0224-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 85 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transforming Dissatisfaction With Services Into Self-Determination: A Social Psychological Perspective on Community Program EffectivenessJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 2009
- Vocational intervention in first-episode psychosis: Individual placement and support v. treatment as usualThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2008
- The Good-Subject Effect: Investigating Participant Demand CharacteristicsThe Journal of General Psychology, 2008
- Supported Employment for Middle-Aged and Older People with SchizophreniaAmerican Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 2008
- The effectiveness of supported employment for people with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2007
- Randomized Trial of Supported Employment Integrated With Assertive Community Treatment for Rural Adults With Severe Mental IllnessSchizophrenia Bulletin, 2005
- The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: implications for internal validityEvaluation and Program Planning, 2003
- Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life researchSocial Science & Medicine, 1999
- Maximizing both external and internal validity in longitudinal true experiments with voluntary treatments: The “combined modified” designEvaluation and Program Planning, 1996
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959