The Effect of the Social Mismatch between Staff Auditors and Client Management on the Collection of Audit Evidence
- 1 August 2012
- journal article
- Published by American Accounting Association in The Accounting Review
- Vol. 88 (1), 31-50
- https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50286
Abstract
This study provides both survey and experimental evidence to consider how social interactions between staff-level auditors and client management may affect staff auditors' perceptions and influence their decisions regarding the collection of audit evidence. During fieldwork, staff-level auditors have extensive interaction with client management. Survey evidence suggests that these staff-level auditors are often “mismatched” with client management, in terms of their experience, age, and accounting knowledge. Experimental results indicate that staff-level auditors may reduce the extent to which they collect evidence to avoid these interactions. Finally, the use of email communication with client management helped to mitigate the reduction in evidence collected caused by avoiding in-person interactions. Interestingly, when not collecting all the evidence, approximately half of the participants documented their findings in a vague or inappropriate manner, which would likely reduce the likelihood that reviewing auditors would identify a problem. Given the extent of audit evidence collected by young staff auditors, these findings have direct implications for workpaper and audit quality. Data Availability: Data and materials used in this study are available upon request.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Offshoring Tax and Audit Procedures: Implications for U.S.-Based Employee EducationIssues in Accounting Education, 2012
- Implicit affective cues and attentional tuning: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin, 2010
- The Effects of Audit Review Format on Review Team JudgmentsAUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2009
- Social-Psychological Influences on Opinion Expression in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated CommunicationCommunication Research, 2008
- Electronic versus Face-to-Face Review: The Effects of Alternative Forms of Review on Auditors' PerformanceThe Accounting Review, 2004
- Power, approach, and inhibition.Psychological Review, 2003
- Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-AnalysisOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2002
- The impact of the review process in hypothesis generation tasksAccounting, Organizations and Society, 1995
- Debiasing Audit Judgment with Accountability: A Framework and Experimental ResultsJournal of Accounting Research, 1993
- The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior.Psychological Review, 1959