Comparison of a Lymph Node Ratio–Based Staging System With the 7th AJCC System for Gastric Cancer
- 1 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 255 (3), 478-485
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31824857e2
Abstract
Objectives: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for gastric cancer bases N status on absolute number of metastatic nodes, regardless of the number of examined nodes. We examined a modified staging system utilizing node ratio (Nr), the ratio of metastatic to examined nodes. Methods: A total of 18,043 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy were identified from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A training set was divided into 5 Nr groups, and a TNrM staging system was constructed. Median survival and overall survival, based on 7th edition AJCC and TNrM staging systems, were compared, and the analysis was repeated in a validation set. Results: Median examined nodes were 10 to 11. For the training set, overall survival for all 5 AJCC N categories was significantly different when sub-grouped into 15 or fewer versus more than 15 examined nodes, but overall survival was similar regardless of the number of examined nodes in 4 of 5 Nr categories. Seven AJCC stages had statistically different overall survival between subgroups, whereas only 1 TNrM stage had statistically different overall survival between subgroups. When misclassification was defined as any subgroup in which median survival fell outside the 95% confidence interval of the group's overall median survival, AJCC staging misclassified 57% of patients and TNrM staging misclassified only 12%. Similar results were found in the validation set. Conclusions: The AJCC system classifies SEER gastric cancer patients into stages in which subgroups often have wide variations in survival. For patients undergoing limited lymph node analysis, the proposed TNrM system may predict survival more accurately.This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the Seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification of gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with the sixth classificationCancer, 2010
- New metastatic lymph node ratio system reduces stage migration in patients undergoing D1 lymphadenectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma.Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2010
- Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Should West Meet East?The Oncologist, 2009
- Positive Lymph Node Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Gastric Cancer After D2 Resection Regardless of the Examined Number of Lymph NodesAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2008
- The impact of total retrieved lymph nodes on staging and survival of patients with pT3 gastric cancerCancer, 2007
- The Ratio Between Metastatic and Examined Lymph Nodes (N Ratio) Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Gastric Cancer Regardless of the Type of LymphadenectomyAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- Patterns of Initial Recurrence in Completely Resected Gastric AdenocarcinomaAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- How many nodes must be examined to accurately stage gastric carcinomas?Cancer, 2002
- Influence of the number of lymph nodes examined on staging of gastric cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2001
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958