Autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction and coronary artery bypass grafting: an anatomical study and clinical implications
- 22 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 134 (1), 181-198
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1948-6
Abstract
Objective To identify possible avenues of sparing the internal mammary artery (IMA) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in women undergoing autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps. Background Optimal autologous reconstruction of the breast and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are often mutually exclusive as they both require utilisation of the IMA as the preferred arterial conduit. Given the prevalence of both breast cancer and coronary artery disease, this is an important issue for women’s health as women with DIEP flap reconstructions and women at increased risk of developing coronary artery disease are potentially restricted from receiving this reconstructive option should the other condition arise. Methods The largest clinical and cadaveric anatomical study (n = 315) to date was performed, investigating four solutions to this predicament by correlating the precise requirements of breast reconstruction and CABG against the anatomical features of the in situ IMAs. This information was supplemented by a thorough literature review. Results Minimum lengths of the left and right IMA needed for grafting to the left-anterior descending artery are 160.08 and 177.80 mm, respectively. Based on anatomical findings, the suitable options for anastomosis to each intercostals space are offered. In addition, 87–91% of patients have IMA perforator vessels to which DIEP flaps can be anastomosed in the first- and second-intercostal spaces. Conclusion We outline five methods of preserving the IMA for future CABG: (1) lowering the level of DIEP flaps to the fourth- and fifth-intercostals spaces, (2) using the DIEP pedicle as an intermediary for CABG, (3) using IMA perforators to spare the IMA proper, (4) using and end-to-side anastomosis between the DIEP pedicle and IMA and (5) anastomosis of DIEP flaps using retrograde flow from the distal IMA. With careful patient selection, we hypothesize using the IMA for autologous breast reconstruction need not be an absolute contraindication for future CABG.Keywords
This publication has 131 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reappraisal of a 20-year experience with the radial artery as a conduit for coronary bypass graftingEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2011
- Medium-term cost analysis of breast reconstructions in a single Dutch centre: A comparison of implants, implants preceded by tissue expansion, LD transpositions and DIEP flapsJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2011
- Long-term (5- to 20-year) patency of the radial artery for coronary bypass graftingThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2010
- Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008International Journal of Cancer, 2010
- Robotic Internal Thoracic Artery HarvestingSurgery Today, 2007
- Risk of Cardiac Death After Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Breast CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgeryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2004
- Postoperative Morphine Requirements of Free TRAM and DIEP FlapsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2001
- Eight years experience using the inferior epigastric artery for myocardial revascularizationEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- Influence of the Internal-Mammary-Artery Graft on 10-Year Survival and Other Cardiac EventsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986