Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 31 October 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 14 (10), e0223994
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223994
Abstract
Systematic scientometric reviews, empowered by computational and visual analytic approaches, offer opportunities to improve the timeliness, accessibility, and reproducibility of studies of the literature of a field of research. On the other hand, effectively and adequately identifying the most representative body of scholarly publications as the basis of subsequent analyses remains a common bottleneck in the current practice. What can we do to reduce the risk of missing something potentially significant? How can we compare different search strategies in terms of the relevance and specificity of topical areas covered? In this study, we introduce a flexible and generic methodology based on a significant extension of the general conceptual framework of citation indexing for delineating the literature of a research field. The method, through cascading citation expansion, provides a practical connection between studies of science from local and global perspectives. We demonstrate an application of the methodology to the research of literature-based discovery (LBD) and compare five datasets constructed based on three use scenarios and corresponding retrieval strategies, namely a query-based lexical search (one dataset), forward expansions starting from a groundbreaking article of LBD (two datasets), and backward expansions starting from a recently published review article by a prominent expert in LBD (two datasets). We particularly discuss the relevance of areas captured by expansion processes with reference to the query-based scientometric visualization. The method used in this study for comparing bibliometric datasets is applicable to comparative studies of search strategies.Keywords
Funding Information
- the SciSIP Program of the National Science Foundation (1633286)
- The Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018S1A3A2075114)
- Yonsei University (2019-22-0066)
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Design and Update of a Classification System: The UCSD Map of SciencePLOS ONE, 2012
- Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis inCiteSpaceExpert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 2012
- Predictive effects of structural variation on citation countsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011
- Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among toolsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011
- Using global mapping to create more accurate document-level maps of research fieldsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010
- Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mappingScientometrics, 2009
- From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite softwareJournal of Informetrics, 2009
- Four stages of a scientific discipline; four types of scientistTrends in Biochemical Sciences, 2009
- Visualizing knowledge domainsAnnual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2003
- Indexing by latent semantic analysisJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1990