Differences Between Polarized Light Dermoscopy and Immersion Contact Dermoscopy for the Evaluation of Skin Lesions
Open Access
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Dermatology
- Vol. 143 (3), 329-338
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.143.3.329
Abstract
Dermoscopy has proven to be a valuable tool in the diagnosis of pigmented and nonpigmented skin lesions,1,2 increasing the clinical diagnostic accuracy3,4 and improving physicians' confidence in their clinical diagnosis.5 Until recently, dermoscopes used only nonpolarized light sources to illuminate the skin, requiring a liquid interface and direct contact between the scope and the skin. With this approach, the amount of light reflected, refracted, and diffracted at the skin surface was reduced, thereby allowing the observer to visualize structures below the stratum corneum. Nonpolarized dermoscopes have been the standard for dermoscopy training and courses and for capturing dermoscopic images for textbooks and manuscripts. However, new commercially available dermoscopes that exploit the properties of cross-polarized light have been recently introduced.6-8 Unlike nonpolarized light dermoscopy (NPD), polarized light dermoscopy (PD) allows visualization of deep skin structures without the necessity of a liquid interface or direct skin contact with the instrument.9 These instruments offer the capability of viewing the skin with (polarized light contact dermoscopy [PCD]) or without (polarized light noncontact dermoscopy [PNCD]) a liquid interface and direct skin contact.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conventional and Polarized Dermoscopy Features of DermatofibromaArchives of Dermatology, 2006
- Dermoscopic semiology: further insights into vascular features by screening a large spectrum of nontumoral skin lesionsBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2004
- Digital Epiluminescence Microscopy Monitoring of High-Risk PatientsArchives of Dermatology, 2004
- Instruments and new technologies for the in vivo diagnosis of melanomaJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2003
- An evaluation of dermoscopy fluids and application techniquesBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2003
- Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: Results of a consensus meeting via the InternetJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2003
- Comparison between morphological parameters in pigmented skin lesion images acquired by means of epiluminescence surface microscopy and polarized-light videomicroscopyClinics in Dermatology, 2002
- Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital epiluminescence microscopy: Patterns of modifications observed in early melanoma, atypical nevi, and common neviJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2000
- Screening and surveillance of patients at high risk for malignant melanoma result in detection of earlier diseaseJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1990
- AN AID TO THE PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PIGMENTED LESIONS OF THE SKINBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1971