Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Nature
- Vol. 437 (7058), 539-542
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04094
Abstract
The earthquake size distribution follows, in most instances, a power law1,2, with the slope of this power law, the ‘b value’, commonly used to describe the relative occurrence of large and small events (a high b value indicates a larger proportion of small earthquakes, and vice versa). Statistically significant variations of b values have been measured in laboratory experiments, mines and various tectonic regimes such as subducting slabs, near magma chambers, along fault zones and in aftershock zones3. However, it has remained uncertain whether these differences are due to differing stress regimes, as it was questionable that samples in small volumes (such as in laboratory specimens, mines and the shallow Earth's crust) are representative of earthquakes in general. Given the lack of physical understanding of these differences, the observation that b values approach the constant 1 if large volumes are sampled4 was interpreted to indicate that b = 1 is a universal constant for earthquakes in general5. Here we show that the b value varies systematically for different styles of faulting. We find that normal faulting events have the highest b values, thrust events the lowest and strike-slip events intermediate values. Given that thrust faults tend to be under higher stress than normal faults we infer that the b value acts as a stress meter that depends inversely on differential stress.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mapping spatial variability of the frequency-magnitude distribution of earthquakesPublished by Elsevier BV ,2002
- Crustal structure and seismicity distribution adjacent to the Pacific and North America plate boundary in southern CaliforniaJournal of Geophysical Research, 2000
- Universality of the Seismic Moment-frequency RelationPure and Applied Geophysics, 1999
- Depth dependence of earthquake frequency‐magnitude distributions in California: Implications for rupture initiationJournal of Geophysical Research, 1997
- Teleseismic b values; Or, much ado about 1.0Journal of Geophysical Research, 1993
- Maximum likelihood estimation of b values for magnitude grouped dataBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1983
- The standard error of the magnitude-frequencybvalueBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1982
- Towards a Physical Understanding of the Earthquake Frequency DistributionGeophysical Journal International, 1973
- The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakesBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1968
- Frequency of earthquakes in California*Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1944