Utility of Two Cancer Organization Websites for a Multiethnic, Public Hospital Oncology Population: Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Vol. 7 (3), e28
- https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7.3.e28
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While information websites have been developed by major cancer organizations, their appropriateness for patients in multiethnic, multilingual public hospital settings has received limited attention. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the utility of cancer information websites for a public hospital patient population. METHODS: A 70-item questionnaire was developed to evaluate cancer information seeking behavior, Internet access and use, and content appropriateness of two cancer information websites: People Living with Cancer from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and Breast Cancer Info from the Susan Komen Breast Cancer Foundation (SKF). Interviews were conducted with consecutive consenting oncology patients seen in a public hospital oncology clinic. RESULTS: Fifty-nine persons participated in the survey. The response rate was 80%. Participants were Caucasian (25%), African American (19%), Hispanic (42%), and Asian/Pacific Islander (11%). English was the primary language in 53% of participants, 56% had a high school education or less, and 74% had an annual income less than US $35000. With respect to computer and Internet use, 71% had computer access, and 44% searched for cancer information online, with more being interested in obtaining online information in the future (63%). Participants who had computer access were likely to be English speaking (P = .04). Those less likely to have previously used a computer tended to have a lower annual income (P = .02) or to be males aged 55 years or older (P < .05). When shown sample content from the two websites, almost all participants stated that it was “easy to understand” (ASCO 96%, SKF 96%) and had “easy to understand terms” (ASCO 94%, SKF 92%). Somewhat fewer respondents agreed that the websites provided “information they could use” (ASCO 88%, SKF 80%) or that they would return to these websites (ASCO 73%, SKF 68%). The majority planned to “discuss website information with their oncologists” (ASCO 82%, SKF 70%). CONCLUSIONS: Multiethnic, multilingual cancer patients at a public county hospital commonly had Internet access and found the content of two websites representative of major cancer organizations to be both understandable and useful. [J Med Internet Res 2005;7(3):e28]This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of e-Health Services between 1999 and 2002: A Growing Digital DivideJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2004
- Survey of computer use for health topics by patients with head and neck cancerHead & Neck, 2004
- Use of information resources by patients with cancer and their companionsCancer, 2004
- What do patients with prostate or breast cancer want from an Internet site? A qualitative study of information needsPatient Education and Counseling, 2004
- Internet use for cancer information among racial/ethnic populations and low literacy groups.Cancer Control, 2003
- The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. PhysiciansJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2003
- Patients’ use of the internet for medical informationJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2002
- Information supplied to cancer patients and their caregivers — no more unmet needs?Supportive Care in Cancer, 2001
- Internet Usage Among Women with Breast Cancer: An Exploratory StudyClinical Breast Cancer, 2000
- Introduction to evaluation of interactive health communication applicationsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1999