Conservative treatment of fractures of the clavicle
Open Access
- 8 September 2011
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Research Notes
- Vol. 4 (1), 333
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-333
Abstract
In the treatment of clavicle fractures, the choice of procedure depends on the possibility of restoring the anatomical functional integrity of the shoulder. We examined 71 patients (51 males and 20 females, mean age 38.9 years) who were affected by clavicle fracture sequelae. Demographic and clinical data and the site of the lesion were recorded for each partecipant. The dissatisfaction of the patient was determined by the presence of 1 or more affirmative answers on the Simple Shoulder Test. The Constant Shoulder Score was also included in the functional and clinical exams. We measured the length of the healthy clavicle and the previously fractured clavicle, and we expressed the difference in length in mm and in percentage shortening. We then examined the correlations between the shortening of the bone and the clinical and functional outcomes of the patients. Sixty patients had a lesion of the diaphysis, 8 patients had a lesion of the lateral third of the clavicle, and 3 patients had a lesion of the medial third of the clavicle. The mean Constant Shoulder Score was 77.9, and 51 of the 71 patients were satisfied with their treatment. Radiography showed a mean clavicle shortening of 10 mm (mean percentage 6.5%). In the 20 dissatisfied patients, the mean clavicle shortening was 15.2 mm (9.7%). In these patients, we found a highly significant association between dissatisfaction with treatment and the amount of bone shortening, (p < 0.0001), as well as with a diaphyseal location (p < 0.05) and with the female sex (p = 0.004). No other variable related to the patient, the type of treatment or the fracture characteristics correlated with the treatment outcome. In the literature, measurements of the shortening of the bone segment following a fracture range between 15 and 23 mm, and marked shortening is correlated with the failure of conservative treatment. However, these data need to be reinterpreted in light of the physiological variability of the clavicle length, which ranges from 140 to 158 mm in the healthy population. Shortening of the bone by more than 9.7% should be the cut-off for predicting failure of conservative treatment.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nonoperative treatment of closed displaced midshaft clavicle fracturesJournal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2010
- Malunion after midshaft clavicle fractures in adultsActa Orthopaedica, 2010
- Operative Treatment of Clavicle Midshaft Fractures: Comparison between Reconstruction Plate and Reconstruction Locking Compression PlateClinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 2010
- Long-term results of conservative management of midshaft clavicle fractureInternational Orthopaedics, 2009
- Anatomy of the Clavicle and Coracoid Process for Reconstruction of the Coracoclavicular LigamentsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2007
- Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the simple shoulder test: Psychometric properties by age and injury typeJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2007
- Conservative treatment of fractures at the middle third of the clavicle: The relevance of shortening and clinical outcomeJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2006
- Short malunions of the clavicle: An anatomic and functional studyJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2005
- Geometric properties and the predicted mechanical behavior of adult human claviclesJournal of Biomechanics, 1993
- A Clinical Method of Functional Assessment of the ShoulderClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1987