Somatosensory assessment and treatment after stroke: An evidence‐practice gap
- 23 January 2015
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
- Vol. 62 (2), 93-104
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12170
Abstract
Loss of body sensations is common after stroke, impacting negatively on recovery and performance of activities of daily living. Despite advances in the evidence for the assessment and treatment of somatosensory impairment post-stroke, the translation from research into clinical practice has been slow. The aim of this study was to determine current clinical practice of occupational therapists and physiotherapists in the assessment and treatment of somatosensory impairment post-stroke.A cross-sectional, self-administered online survey of occupational therapists and physiotherapists currently working with stroke clients in Australian health organisations, identified through an audit of stroke rehabilitation services and a professional member association.172 clinicians, 62.8% occupational therapists and 37.2% physiotherapists currently working with stroke clients completed the survey. Most respondents (93.0%) indicated routinely assessing for sensory loss in stroke clients. The most commonly used measures were light touch and proprioception, with the majority (70.4%) not using standardised measures. Most respondents (97.7%) reported providing treatment to address sensory impairment, with compensatory strategies and sensory re-education the two most frequently reported. Evidence-based treatment choices were not common and therapists frequently relied on colleagues' opinions and previous experience to inform practice. Therapists commonly experienced barriers to implementing evidence-based sensory rehabilitation, including time constraints, large caseloads and lack of access to evidence-based somatosensory assessment and treatment resources.Most therapists perceived somatosensory assessment and treatment as important. However, frequently utilised methods lack a sound theoretical or empirical basis. Despite published evidence regarding somatosensory assessment and treatment, an evidence-practice gap exists.Keywords
Funding Information
- Australian Research Council (FT0992299)
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Touch and Body SensationsPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2012
- Measures of sensation in neurological conditions: a systematic reviewClinical Rehabilitation, 2011
- SENSe: Study of the Effectiveness of Neurorehabilitation on SensationNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2011
- Frequency of discriminative sensory loss in the hand after stroke in a rehabilitation settingJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2011
- Evidence for the retraining of sensation after stroke remains limitedAustralian Occupational Therapy Journal, 2010
- Stroke Rehabilitation in EuropeStroke, 2006
- Loss of somatic sensationPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2006
- Perceptions of evidence‐based practice: A survey of Australian occupational therapistsAustralian Occupational Therapy Journal, 2003
- Evaluation of impaired fingertip texture discrimination and wrist position sense in patients affected by stroke: Comparison of clinical and new quantitative measuresJournal of Hand Therapy, 2002
- Somatosensory Loss after StrokeCritical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 1995