Physician opinions about an anatomy core curriculum: A case for medical imaging and vertical integration
- 10 September 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anatomical Sciences Education
- Vol. 7 (4), 251-261
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1401
Abstract
Pre-clinical anatomy curricula must provide medical students with the knowledge needed in a variety of medical and surgical specialties. But do physicians within specialties agree about what anatomical knowledge is most important in their practices? And, what is the common core of anatomical knowledge deemed essential by physicians in different specialties? Answers to these questions would be useful in designing pre-clinical anatomy courses. The primary aim of this study was to assess the importance of a human gross anatomy course by soliciting the opinions of physicians from a range of specialties. We surveyed 93 physicians to determine the importance of specific anatomical topics in their own practices. Their responses were analyzed to assess variation in intra- and inter-departmental attitudes toward the importance of anatomy. Nearly all of the topics taught in the course were deemed important by the clinicians as a group, but respondents showed little agreement on the rank order of importance of anatomical topics. Overall, only medical imaging received high importance by nearly all respondents, and lower importance was attached to embryology and lymphatic anatomy. Our survey data, however, also suggested distinct hierarchies in the importance assigned to anatomical topics within specialties. Given that physicians view the importance of anatomy differently, we suggest that students revisit anatomy through a vertically integrated curriculum tailored to provide specialty-specific anatomical training to advanced students based on their areas of clinical interest. Integration of medical imaging into pre-clinical anatomy courses, already underway in many medical schools, is of high clinical relevance. Anat Sci Educ 7: 251–261. © 2013 American Association of Anatomists.Keywords
Funding Information
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine Summer Research Program
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perceptions of anatomy: Critical components in the clinical settingAnatomical Sciences Education, 2012
- Why don’t they know enough about anatomy? A narrative reviewMedical Teacher, 2011
- Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schoolsAnz Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Incorporating radiology into medical gross anatomy: Does the use of cadaver CT scans improve students' academic performance in anatomy?Anatomical Sciences Education, 2010
- Basic Science Right, Not Basic Science Lite: Medical Education at a CrossroadJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2009
- How much anatomy is enough?Anatomical Sciences Education, 2008
- Anatomy in a Modern Medical CurriculumThe Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2007
- Determination of required anatomical knowledge for clinical practice in emergency medicine: national curriculum planning using a modified Delphi techniqueEmergency Medicine Journal, 2006
- Clinical and basic science teachers’ opinions about the required depth of biomedical knowledge for medical studentsMedical Teacher, 2006
- Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directorsClinical Anatomy, 1999