A large-scale study on subjective perception of discomfort during 7 and 1.5 T MRI examinations
- 19 May 2011
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Bioelectromagnetics
- Vol. 32 (8), 610-619
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20680
Abstract
A study on subjective perception has been carried out in order to gain further insight into subjective discomfort and sensations experienced during 7 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study provides information about subjective acceptance, which is essential if 7 T MRI is to become a clinical diagnostic tool. Of 573 subjects who underwent 7 T MRI, 166 were also examined at 1.5 T, providing a means of discriminating field‐dependent discomfort. All subjects judged sources of discomfort and physiological sensations on an 11‐point scale (0 = no side effects, 10 = intolerable side effects) and scores were analyzed separately for exam phases, with and without table movement at each field strength. Results revealed that 7 T MRI was, in general, judged more uncomfortable than 1.5 T; however, most subjects rated the effects as being non‐critical (mean scores between 0.5 and 3.5). Significant differences were detected regarding vertigo and sweating between subjects positioned “head‐first” and “feet‐first” at 7 T (worse in “head‐first”) and between 7 and 1.5 T (worse at 7 T), with the effects being more pronounced in the moving compared to the stationary table position. The most unpleasant factor at 7 T was the extensive examination duration, while potentially field‐dependent sensations were rated less bothersome. In summary, our study indicates that although certain sensations increase at 7 T compared to 1.5 T, they are unlikely to hinder the use of 7 T MRI as a clinical diagnostic tool. Bioelectromagnetics. Bioelectromagnetics 32:610–619, 2011.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Thresholds for perceiving metallic taste at high magnetic fieldJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2007
- Safety of human MRI at static fields above the FDA 8T guideline: Sodium imaging at 9.4T does not affect vital signs or cognitive abilityJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2007
- Exposure, health complaints and cognitive performance among employees of an MRI scanners manufacturing departmentJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2005
- Numerical evaluation of the fields induced by body motion in or near high-field MRI scannersProgress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 2005
- Static magnetic field effects on human subjects related to magnetic resonance imaging systemsProgress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 2005
- Health effects of static magnetic fields—a review of the epidemiological evidenceProgress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 2005
- Biological effects of exposure to magnetic resonance imaging: an overviewBioMedical Engineering OnLine, 2004
- Effect of static magnetic field exposure of up to 8 Tesla on sequential human vital sign measurementsJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2003
- Size ?H? oxygen cylinder: Accidental MR projectile at 1.5 TeslaJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2003
- Projectile Cylinder Accidents Resulting from the Presence of Ferromagnetic Nitrous Oxide or Oxygen Tanks in the MR SuiteAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001