Does A Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty Restore Function Without Failure Regardless of Alignment Category?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2013
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 471 (3), 1000-1007
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2613-z
Abstract
Kinematically aligned TKA restores function by aligning the femoral and tibial components to the normal or prearthritic joint lines of the knee. However, aligning the components to the joint lines of the normal knee also aligns the tibial component in varus, creating concern that varus alignment might result in poor function and early catastrophic failure. We therefore determined whether function and the incidence of catastrophic failure were different when the tibial component, knee, and limb alignment were in a specified normal range, varus outlier, or valgus outlier. We prospectively followed all 198 patients (214 knees) who underwent TKAs between February and October 2008. We treated each knee in this cohort of patients with a kinematically aligned, cruciate-retaining prosthesis implanted using patient-specific guides. From a long-leg scanogram, we measured and categorized alignment of the tibial component as in range (≤ 0°) or a varus outlier (> 0°), alignment of the knee as in range (between -2.5° to -7.4° valgus) or a varus (> -2.5°) or valgus (< -7.4°) outlier, and alignment of the limb as in range (0° ± 3°) or a varus (> 3°) or valgus (< -3°) outlier. We assessed function using the Oxford Knee Score and WOMAC score, and reported catastrophic failure as the incidence of revision attributable to loosening, wear, and instability of the femoral or tibial components. The minimum followup was 31 months (mean, 38 months; range, 31-43 months). The mean Oxford Knee Score of 43 and WOMAC score of 92 were similar between the three alignment categories. The incidence of catastrophic failure in each alignment category was zero. Kinematically aligned TKA restores function without catastrophic failure regardless of the alignment category. Because 75% of patients had their tibial component categorized as a varus outlier and also had high function and a zero incidence of catastrophic failure, the concern that kinematic alignment compromises function and places the components at a high risk for catastrophic failure is unfounded and should be of interest to surgeons committed to cutting the tibia perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the tibia. Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Kinematically Versus Mechanically Aligned Total Knee ArthroplastyOrthopedics, 2012
- Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up?International Orthopaedics, 2008
- Results of an Initial Experience with Custom-fit Positioning Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Series of 48 PatientsOrthopedics, 2008
- Custom-Fit Total Knee Arthroplasty (OtisKnee) Results in MalalignmentThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2008
- AN ABJS BEST PAPERClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2007
- The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacementThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2007
- The John Insall Award: Patient Expectations Affect Satisfaction with Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2006
- Three-Dimensional Mechanics, Kinematics, and Morphology of the Knee Viewed in Virtual RealityJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2005
- Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic condylar prosthesis. A ten-year follow-up study.The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1995
- The Axes of Rotation of the KneeClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1993