Applying Trigger Tools to Detect Adverse Events Associated With Outpatient Surgery
- 1 March 2011
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Patient Safety
- Vol. 7 (1), 45-59
- https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0b013e31820d164b
Abstract
The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of 5 triggers to detect adverse events (AEs) associated with outpatient surgery. Triggers use surveillance algorithms derived from clinical logic to flag cases where AEs have most likely occurred. Current efforts to detect AEs have focused primarily on the inpatient setting, despite the increase in outpatient surgery in all health care settings. Using trigger logic, we retrospectively evaluated data from 3 large health care systems' electronic medical records. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had an outpatient (same-day) surgery in 2007 and at least 1 clinical note in the 6 months after the surgery. Two nurse abstractors reviewed a sample of trigger-flagged cases from each health care system. After reaching interrater reliability targets (κ > 0.60), we calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) of each trigger and the confidence interval of the estimate. The surgical triggers flagged between 1% and 22% of the outpatient surgery cases, with a wide range in PPVs (6.0%-62.0%). The pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis and emergency department triggers had the lowest proportion of flagged cases along with the highest PPVs, showing the most promise for screening cases with a high probability of AE occurrence. Triggers may be useful in identifying a narrow set of surgeries for further review to determine if a surgical AE occurred, complementing existing tools and initiatives used to detect AEs. Improved detection of AEs in outpatient surgery should help target potential areas for quality improvement.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incorrect Surgical Procedures Within and Outside of the Operating RoomArchives of Surgery, 2009
- Measuring agreement of administrative data with chart data using prevalence unadjusted and adjusted kappaBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2009
- Return hospital visits and morbidity within 60 days after day surgery: a retrospective study of 18,736 day surgical proceduresActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2006
- Classification of Surgical ComplicationsAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Analgesia and discharge following preincisional ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block combined with general or spinal anaesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphyActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2004
- Physician-reviewers' perceptions and judgments about quality of careInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2001
- Commentary: Quality of Care and Cost Containment Are the Hospital Based Ambulatory Surgery Challenges for the FutureAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 2000
- Does The Complications Screening Program flag cases with process of care problems? Using explicit criteria to judge processesInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1999
- What Happens After Discharge? Return Hospital Visits After Ambulatory SurgeryAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1997
- What Happens After Discharge? Return Hospital Visits After Ambulatory SurgeryAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1997