Dual-task costs and benefits in anti-saccade performance
- 17 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Experimental Brain Research
- Vol. 205 (4), 545-557
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2393-1
Abstract
It has been reported that anti-saccade performance is facilitated by diverting attention through a secondary task (Kristjánsson et al. in Nat Neurosci 4:1037-1042, 2001). This finding supports the idea that the withdrawal of resources that would be taken up by the erroneous movement plan makes it easier to overcome the tendency to look towards the imperative stimulus. We first report an attempt to replicate this finding. Four observers were extensively tested in an anti-saccade paradigm. The luminance of the fixation point or peripheral target was briefly increased or decreased. In the dual-task condition observers signalled the direction of the luminance change. In the single-task condition the discrimination stimulus was presented, but could be ignored as it required no response. We found an overall dual-task cost in anti-saccade latency, although some facilitation was observed in the accuracy. The discrepancy between the two studies was attributed to performance in the single-task condition. For latency facilitation to occur, performance should not be affected by the discrimination stimulus when it is task-irrelevant. We show that naive, untrained observers could not ignore this irrelevant visual event. If it occurred before the imperative movement signal, the event acted as a warning signal, speeding up anti-saccade generation. If it occurred after the imperative movement stimulus, it acted as a remote distractor and interfered with the generation of the correct movement. Under normal circumstances, these basic oculomotor effects operate in both single- and dual-task conditions. An overall dual-task cost rides on top of this latency modulation. This overall cost is best accounted for by an increase in the response criterion for saccade generation in the more demanding dual-task condition.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of environmental statistics on inhibition of saccadic returnProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- Temporal dynamics of saccadic distractionJournal of Vision, 2009
- A Population Coding Account for Systematic Variation in Saccadic Dead TimeJournal of Neurophysiology, 2007
- Incomplete Suppression of Distractor-Related Activity in the Frontal Eye Field Results in Curved SaccadesJournal of Neurophysiology, 2006
- Neural Correlates of the Automatic and Goal-Driven Biases in Orienting Spatial AttentionJournal of Neurophysiology, 2004
- Working Memory and the Suppression of Reflexive SaccadesJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2002
- New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2001
- Attentional limits in memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1995
- Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1992
- Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1992