Patient-centred outcomes in clinical research: does it really matter?
Open Access
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier BV in British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Vol. 100 (1), 1-3
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem351
Abstract
‘It does not matter whether the degree of patients’ satisfaction reflects the competence of the physician or the quality of care. The important thing is that if patients are dissatisfied, health care has not achieved its goal’.1Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient satisfaction with anaesthesia care: What is patient satisfaction, how should it be measured, and what is the evidence for assuring high patient satisfaction?Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 2006
- Development and Validation of a Perioperative Satisfaction QuestionnaireAnesthesiology, 2005
- Publications in Anesthesia Journals: Quality and Clinical RelevanceAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2004
- Patients' experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of careQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2002
- Influence of expectations and actual pain experiences on satisfaction with postoperative pain managementEuropean Journal of Pain Supplements, 2001
- Measurement of patient satisfaction as an outcome of regional anesthesia and analgesia: A systematic reviewRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2001
- OUTCOMES IN PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE AND ANESTHESIOLOGYAnesthesiology Clinics of North America, 2000
- Development of a patient satisfaction scaleResearch in Nursing & Health, 1986
- Patient satisfaction in primary health care: A literature review and analysisEvaluation and Program Planning, 1983
- Using patient information to identify areas for service improvementHealth Care Management Review, 1982