Agrochemical spray drift; assessment and mitigation—A review*
- 10 December 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B
- Vol. 46 (1), 1-23
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2010.515161
Abstract
During application of agrochemicals spray droplets can drift beyond the intended target to non-target receptors, including water, plants and animals. Factors affecting this spray drift include mode of application, droplet size, which can be modified by the nozzle types, formulation adjuvants, wind direction, wind speed, air stability, relative humidity, temperature and height of released spray relative to the crop canopy. The rate of fall of spray droplets depends upon the size of the droplets but is modified by entrainment in a mobile air mass and is also influenced by the rate of evaporation of the liquid constituting the aerosol. The longer the aerosol remains in the air before falling to the ground (or alternatively striking an object above ground) the greater the opportunity for it to be carried away from its intended target. In general, all size classes of droplets are capable of movement off target, but the smallest are likely to move the farthest before depositing on the ground or a non-target receptor. It is not possible to avoid spray drift completely but it can be minimized by using best-management practices. These include using appropriate nozzle types, shields, spray pressure, volumes per area sprayed, tractor speed and only spraying when climatic conditions are suitable. Field layout can also influence spray drift, whilst crop-free and spray-free buffer zones and windbreak crops can also have a mitigating effect. Various models are available to estimate the environmental exposure from spray drift at the time of application.Keywords
This publication has 74 references indexed in Scilit:
- DROPLET-SIZE CHARACTERIZATION OF HANDHELD ATOMIZATION EQUIPMENT TYPICALLY USED IN VECTOR CONTROL1Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 2007
- Spray deposits and losses in different sized apple trees from an axial fan orchard sprayer: 3. Effects of air volumetric flow rateCrop Protection, 2003
- Shields to Reduce Spray DriftJournal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1997
- Effects of Polymer Composition and Viscosity on Droplet Size of Recirculated Spray SolutionsJournal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1997
- Deposition characteristics and biological effectiveness of fungicides applied to winter wheat and the hazards of drift when using different types of hydraulic nozzlesCrop Protection, 1992
- Airborne drift residues collected near apple orchard environments due to application of insecticide mixturesBulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1991
- Air-assisted spraying of arable crops, in relation to deposition, drift and pesticide performanceCrop Protection, 1990
- Spray Drift from Agricultural Pesticide ApplicationsJournal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 1978
- DDT in the Biosphere: Where Does It Go?Science, 1971
- Problems Relating to Application of Agricultural Chemicals and Resulting Drift ResiduesAnnual Review of Entomology, 1964