Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics
Top Cited Papers
- 10 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Advances in Health Sciences Education
- Vol. 15 (5), 625-632
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- A prospective global measure, the Punum Ladder, provides more valid assessments of quality of life than a retrospective transition measureJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scalesMedical Education, 2008
- The Seven Deadly Sins of Statistical AnalysisAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 1996
- Binary methods for continuous outcomes: A parametric alternativeJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Dichotomization of continuous variables: The implications for meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990
- The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of ReliabilityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960
- THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE IN CASES OF NON-NORMAL VARIATIONBiometrika, 1931
- An Empirical Determination of the Distribution of Means, Standard Deviations and Correlation Coefficients Drawn from Rectangular PopulationsThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1931