Comparison of Magnetic Field Analysis Methods Considering Magnetic Anisotropy
- 19 January 2010
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
- Vol. 46 (2), 187-190
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2009.2033558
Abstract
The magnetic field analysis results on grain-oriented silicon steel sheet and nongrain-oriented silicon steel sheet by the isotropic method, the two-axis isotropic method, the two-axis anisotropic method, the ¿ anisotropic method, and the ¿HB anisotropic method, which are 2-D magnetic analysis methods, are compared. In analyzing the magnetic field in the isotropic material, the isotropic method is more appropriate than the two-axis isotropic method. For the anisotropic material in which the magnetic flux density is much less than saturation magnetic flux density, the two-axis anisotropic method is more preferable than the ¿ anisotropic method, because the result of the two-axis anisotropic method is similar to that of the ¿HB anisotropic method. However, for the analysis in high magnetic flux density near the saturation magnetic flux density, the ¿ anisotropic method is more suitable than the two-axis anisotropic method.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- A proposal of finite-element analysis considering two-dimensional magnetic propertiesIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2002
- Improvements of single sheet testers for measurement of 2-D magnetic properties up to high flux densityIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1999
- Finite element analysis of transformer model core with measured reluctivity tensorIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1997
- An improved numerical analysis of flux distributions in anisotropic materialsIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1994