Adverse events in health care: issues in measurement
Open Access
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Quality in health care : QHC
- Vol. 9 (1), 47-52
- https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.9.1.47
Abstract
The principle that studying adverse events can produce information which leads to quality improvements is far from new and has been much used outside of health care.2, 3 It has an intuitive power—after all, we all learn much as individuals from our own mistakes, and it seems reasonable to hypothesise that organisations can also learn a great deal from their errors. However, it is easy to overlook the complexities of measurement involved in defining, classifying, identifying, describing, and analysing such adverse events.4 Like any other measurement tools, those used with adverse events need to be tested to ensure that they work. This article presents an analysis of the issues involved in defining adverse events, the sources of data which can be used to identify such events, and the validity and reliability of measures of quality based on adverse events in health care.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hospital Characteristics Associated With Adverse Events and Substandard CareJAMA, 1991
- Beyond generic occurrence screening.1991
- Effect of Outcome on Physician Judgments of Appropriateness of CareJAMA, 1991
- A Critique of the Use of Generic Screening in Quality AssessmentJAMA, 1991
- Reliability and Validity of Judgments Concerning Adverse Events Suffered by Hospitalized PatientsMedical Care, 1989
- Accuracy of generic screens in identifying quality problems: analysis of false-positive and false-negative occurrences.1988
- Measuring differences between teaching and nonteaching hospitals.1988
- Iatrogenesis: Just what the doctor orderedJournal of Community Health, 1980
- Medical insurance feasibility study. A technical summary.1978
- Measuring the Quality of Medical CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1976