Public health program capacity for sustainability: a new framework
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 February 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Implementation Science
- Vol. 8 (1), 15
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-15
Abstract
Background: Public health programs can only deliver benefits if they are able to sustain activities over time. There is a broad literature on program sustainability in public health, but it is fragmented and there is a lack of consensus on core constructs. The purpose of this paper is to present a new conceptual framework for program sustainability in public health. Methods: This developmental study uses a comprehensive literature review, input from an expert panel, and the results of concept-mapping to identify the core domains of a conceptual framework for public health program capacity for sustainability. The concept-mapping process included three types of participants (scientists, funders, and practitioners) from several public health areas (e.g., tobacco control, heart disease and stroke, physical activity and nutrition, and injury prevention). Results: The literature review identified 85 relevant studies focusing on program sustainability in public health. Most of the papers described empirical studies of prevention-oriented programs aimed at the community level. The concept-mapping process identified nine core domains that affect a program’s capacity for sustainability: Political Support, Funding Stability, Partnerships, Organizational Capacity, Program Evaluation, Program Adaptation, Communications, Public Health Impacts, and Strategic Planning. Concept-mapping participants further identified 93 items across these domains that have strong face validity—89% of the individual items composing the framework had specific support in the sustainability literature. Conclusions: The sustainability framework presented here suggests that a number of selected factors may be related to a program’s ability to sustain its activities and benefits over time. These factors have been discussed in the literature, but this framework synthesizes and combines the factors and suggests how they may be interrelated with one another. The framework presents domains for public health decision makers to consider when developing and implementing prevention and intervention programs. The sustainability framework will be useful for public health decision makers, program managers, program evaluators, and dissemination and implementation researchers.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future researchImplementation Science, 2012
- A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mappingImplementation Science, 2011
- Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service SectorsAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2010
- Implementation Research in Mental Health Services: an Emerging Science with Conceptual, Methodological, and Training challengesAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2008
- Measuring persistence of implementation: QUERI SeriesImplementation Science, 2008
- Translating Cancer Control Research Into Primary Care Practice: A Conceptual FrameworkAmerican Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 2008
- Building a Local Agenda for Dissemination of Research Into PracticeJournal of Public Health Management and Practice, 2008
- The Impact of Tobacco Control Programs on Adult SmokingAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2008
- Is Sustainability Possible? A Review and Commentary on Empirical Studies of Program SustainabilityAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 2005
- Program sustainability begins with the first eventsEvaluation and Program Planning, 2005