Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term
- 1 July 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 211 (1), 53.e1-53.e5
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.034
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Obesity, Pregnancy Complications, and Birth OutcomesSeminars in Reproductive Medicine, 2012
- Risk of First-Stage and Second-Stage Cesarean Delivery by Maternal Body Mass Index Among Nulliparous Women in Labor at TermObstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- Using a Simplified Bishop Score to Predict Vaginal DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- Elective Induction Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women With an Unfavorable CervixObstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- The maternal body mass index: a strong association with delivery routeAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2010
- Elective Induction Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women With a Favorable CervixObstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
- ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of LaborObstetrics & Gynecology, 2009
- Pregnancy and ObesityObstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 2009
- Maternal Outcomes in Pregnancies Complicated by ObesityObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate–a population-based screening studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004