Advanced provision of emergency contraception to postnatal women in China makes no difference in abortion rates: a randomized controlled trial
- 31 August 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Contraception
- Vol. 72 (2), 111-116
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2005.02.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Advanced provision of emergency contraception does not reduce abortion ratesContraception, 2004
- Emergency contraception and fire extinguishers: A prevention paradoxAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- Contraceptive Use among U.S. Women Having Abortions in 2000-2001Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2002
- Switching Emergency Contraception to Over-the-Counter StatusThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Reasons for pregnancy termination, contraceptive habits and contraceptive failure among Swedish women requesting an early pregnancy terminationActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2002
- Peri-abortion contraceptive care: Can we reduce the incidence of repeat abortions?BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health, 2001
- Emergency contraception: a review of the programmatic and social science literatureContraception, 2000
- The Effects of Self-Administering Emergency ContraceptionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Emergency Postcoital ContraceptionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- History and Efficacy of Emergency Contraception: Beyond Coca-ColaInternational Family Planning Perspectives, 1996