Veterans Health Administration Patients’ Use of the Private Sector for Coronary Revascularization In New York
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Medical Care
- Vol. 44 (6), 519-526
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000215888.20004.5e
Abstract
We sought to quantify Veterans Health Administration (VA) patients' utilization of coronary revascularization in the private sector and to assess the potential impact of directing this care to high-performance hospitals. Using VA and New York State administrative and clinical databases, we conducted a retrospective cohort study examining residents of New York State who were enrolled in the VA and underwent either coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 1999 or 2000 (n=6562) in either the VA or the private sector. We first calculated the proportion of revascularizations obtained in the VA and the private sector. We then identified the private sector hospitals in which these men obtained revascularizations and determined potential changes in mortality and travel burden associated with directing private sector care to high performance hospitals. VA patients in New York were much more likely to undergo revascularization in the private sector than in VA hospitals: 83% of CABGs (2341/2829) and 87% of PCIs (4054/4665) were obtained in the private sector. Private sector utilization was distributed evenly across high- and low-mortality hospitals. Directing private-sector CABG surgery to high-performance hospitals could have reduced expected mortality by 24% (from 2.3% to 1.7%) and would only increase median travel time from 21 to 30 minutes. The benefit of redirecting PCI care is minimal. For high-mortality procedures that veterans frequently obtain in the private sector, like CABG, directing care to high-performance hospitals may be an effective way to improve outcomes for veterans.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- New York's Statistical Model Accurately Predicts Mortality Risk for Veterans Who Obtain Private Sector CABGHealth Services Research, 2005
- Care following Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Veterans Administration Medical Centers: A Comparison with MedicareHealth Services Research, 2004
- Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measuresSurgery, 2004
- Do Well-Publicized Risk-Adjusted Outcomes Reports Affect Hospital Volume?Medical Care, 2004
- Relationship Between Processes of Care and Coronary Bypass Operative Mortality and MorbidityMedical Care, 2004
- Provider Profiling and Quality Improvement Efforts in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryMedical Care, 2003
- Predicting the Risk of Death from Heart Failure After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2001
- No continuous relationship between veterans affairs hospital coronary artery bypass grafting surgical volume and operative mortalityThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1996
- New York state's cardiac surgery reporting system: Four years laterThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
- Consumers and Hospital Use: The HCFA “Death List”Health Affairs, 1988