Grammatical processing in language learners
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Applied Psycholinguistics
- Vol. 27 (1), 3-42
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716406060024
Abstract
The ability to process the linguistic input in real time is crucial for successfully acquiring a language, and yet little is known about how language learners comprehend or produce language in real time. Against this background, we have conducted a detailed study of grammatical processing in language learners using experimental psycholinguistic techniques and comparing different populations (mature native speakers, child first language [L1] and adult second language [L2] learners) as well as different domains of language (morphology and syntax). This article presents an overview of the results from this project and of other previous studies, with the aim of explaining how grammatical processing in language learners differs from that of mature native speakers. For child L1 processing, we will argue for a continuity hypothesis claiming that the child's parsing mechanism is basically the same as that of mature speakers and does not change over time. Instead, empirical differences between child and mature speaker's processing can be explained by other factors such as the child's limited working memory capacity and by less efficient lexical retrieval. In nonnative (adult L2) language processing, some striking differences to native speakers were observed in the domain of sentence processing. Adult learners are guided by lexical–semantic cues during parsing in the same way as native speakers, but less so by syntactic information. We suggest that the observed L1/L2 differences can be explained by assuming that the syntactic representations adult L2 learners compute during comprehension are shallower and less detailed than those of native speakers.Keywords
This publication has 100 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effects of late acquisition of L2 and the consequences of immigration on L1 for semantic and morpho-syntactic language aspectsCognition, 2004
- Reading‐Time Evidence for Intermediate Linguistic Structure in Long‐Distance DependenciesSyntax, 2004
- Native and non-native processing of English wh- questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraintsApplied Psycholinguistics, 2001
- Assessing the development of automaticity in second language word recognitionApplied Psycholinguistics, 1998
- How adult second language learning differs from child first language developmentBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1996
- Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions; Demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigmJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1996
- Sentence processing without empty categoriesLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 1991
- Empty categories in sentence processingLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 1989
- The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehensionJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1989
- Intake: On Models and Methods for Discovering Learners' Processing of InputStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 1985