Neurostatus e-Scoring improves consistency of Expanded Disability Status Scale assessments: A proof of concept study
- 11 July 2016
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Vol. 23 (4), 597-603
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458516657439
Abstract
Background: To improve the consistency of standardized Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assessments, an electronic data capture tool and analysis tool was developed, Neurostatus e-Scoring (NESC). This tool allows real-time feedback by comparing entries with established scoring rules. Objective: To test whether using NESC reduces inconsistencies as compared to the paper-and-pencil version of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (pEDSS). Methods: In all, 100 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were assessed in random order on the same day by pairs of neurologists, one using pEDSS and one NESC. We compared inter-rater reliability and frequency of inconsistencies in Neurostatus subscores, functional system (FS) scores, ambulation and EDSS steps. Results: Inconsistencies of any type were more likely to occur when using pEDSS (mean odds ratio (95% confidence interval (CI)) = 2.93 (1.62; 5.29)). This was also the case for FS score inconsistencies (2.54 (1.40; 4.61)) and more likely for patients in the lower EDSS range (⩽3.5 vs >3.5) (5.32 (1.19; 23.77)). Overall, inter-rater agreement for the assessed Neurostatus subscores was high (median and inter-quartile range = 0.84 (0.73, 0.81)). Conclusion: Our data provide class II evidence that the use of NESC increases consistency of standardized EDSS assessments, and may thus have the potential to decrease noise and increase power of MS clinical trials.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Disability outcome measures in multiple sclerosis clinical trials: current status and future prospectsThe Lancet Neurology, 2012
- Clinical scales for multiple sclerosisJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 1996
- Clinical scoring methods for multiple sclerosisAnnals of Neurology, 1994
- Inter‐ and intrarater scoring agreement using grades 1.0 to 3.5 of the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Neurology, 1992
- An Assessment of Disability Rating Scales Used in Multiple SclerosisArchives of Neurology, 1991
- Observer Disagreement in Rating Neurologic Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis: Facts and ConsequencesEuropean Neurology, 1991
- Interrater variability with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Functional Systems (FS) in a multiple sclerosis clinical trialNeurology, 1990
- Interrater Reliability in Assessing Functional Systems and Disability on the Kurtzke Scale in Multiple SclerosisArchives of Neurology, 1988
- Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosisNeurology, 1983
- A New Scale for Evaluating Disability in Multiple SclerosisNeurology, 1955