Emergency Conversion to General Anesthesia Is a Tolerable Risk in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy
- 5 December 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR) in American Journal of Neuroradiology
- Vol. 41 (1), 122-127
- https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a6321
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke is performed with the patient under local anesthesia, conscious sedation, or general anesthesia. According to recent trials, up to 16% of patients require emergency conversion to general anesthesia during mechanical thrombectomy. This study investigated the procedural and clinical outcomes after emergency conversion in comparison with local anesthesia, conscious sedation, and general anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 254 patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute large-vessel occlusion. The procedure was started with the patient either under local anesthesia, conscious sedation, or general anesthesia. Emergency conversion was defined as induction of general anesthesia during mechanical thrombectomy. The primary outcomes were successful reperfusion (TICI 2b/3) and functional independence (mRS at 90 days, ≤2). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (9.8%) required emergency conversion to general anesthesia. The time from admission to flow restoration was increased under general anesthesia (median, 137 minutes) and emergency conversion (median, 138 minutes) compared with local anesthesia (median 110 minutes). After adjustment for confounders, emergency conversion to general anesthesia and primary general anesthesia had comparable chances of successful reperfusion (OR = 1.28; 95% CI, 0.31–5.25). Patients with emergency conversion had a tendency toward higher chances of functional independence (OR = 4.48; 95% CI, 0.49–40.86) compared with primary general anesthesia, but not compared with local anesthesia (OR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.14–5.11) and conscious sedation (OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.17–6.53). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with emergency conversion did not have lower chances of successful reperfusion or functional independence compared those with primary general anesthesia, and time to flow restoration was also similar. We found no evidence supporting the primary induction of general anesthesia in patients at risk for emergency conversion.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Thrombectomy within 8 Hours after Symptom Onset in Ischemic StrokeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Type of Anesthesia and Differences in Clinical Outcome After Intra-Arterial Treatment for Ischemic StrokeStroke, 2015
- Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic StrokeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke with Perfusion-Imaging SelectionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic StrokeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Conscious Sedation versus General Anesthesia during Endovascular Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2014
- General Is Better Than Local Anesthesia During Endovascular ProceduresStroke, 2010
- Collateral Vessels on CT Angiography Predict Outcome in Acute Ischemic StrokeStroke, 2009
- Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric ModelsBiometrical Journal, 2008
- Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapyThe Lancet, 2000