Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: not yet a suitable alternative to CT‐PA
- 1 May 2012
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Vol. 10 (5), 741-742
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04678.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for an acute pulmonary embolism: results of the ‘IRM‐EP’ studyJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2012
- Performance of 4 Clinical Decision Rules in the Diagnostic Management of Acute Pulmonary EmbolismAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Time Trends in Pulmonary Embolism in the United StatesJAMA Internal Medicine, 2011
- Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Pulmonary EmbolismAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2010
- Medical Imaging in the 21st Century — Getting the Best Bang for the RadThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Diagnostic management of clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolismJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2009
- Effectiveness of Managing Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Using an Algorithm Combining Clinical Probability, D-Dimer Testing, and Computed TomographyJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2006
- Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Evaluation with Multi–Detector Row CT versus Digital Subtraction Pulmonary ArteriographyRadiology, 2004
- Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Outpatients: Comparison of Thin-Collimation Multi–Detector Row Spiral CT and Planar Ventilation-Perfusion ScintigraphyRadiology, 2003
- Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective studyThe Lancet, 2002