Evaluating and classifying POM journals
- 1 May 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Operations Management
- Vol. 15 (2), 123-138
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(96)00102-7
Abstract
A multitude of journals impact the production and operations management (POM) discipline. POM researchers, practitioners, and students all need objective means of rating these journals' impacts on the field. By applying an established multifaceted citation-based methodology, journals are assigned to categories (elite and major) along each of four dimensions (breadth, consistency, trend, and intensity of recognition) and subsequently organized into distinct tiers of importance to the production and operations management field. The data underlying this study consist of 13,992 periodical citations that appeared in three prominent POM journals over a recent five-year period.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- An empirical assessment of influences on POM researchOmega, 1996
- POM research productivity in U.S. business schoolsJournal of Operations Management, 1996
- Institutional research productivity in production and operations managementJournal of Operations Management, 1996
- Update on MIS researchACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 1992
- An empirical assessment of the perceived relevance and quality of POM-related journals by academiciansJournal of Operations Management, 1991
- The Impact of Non‐Serial Publications on Research in Accounting and FinanceAbacus, 1991
- Can the field of MIS be disciplined?Communications of the ACM, 1989
- Using Citation Analysis to Assess the Impact of Journals and Articles on Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR)Journal of Accounting Research, 1985
- MIS researchACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 1984
- Two Decades of the Journal of Accounting ResearchJournal of Accounting Research, 1984