The Empirical Assessment of Technology Differences: Comparing the Comparable
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Vol. 88 (1), 186-192
- https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.2006.88.1.186
Abstract
Since the first statement of Hicks's induced innovation hypothesis in 1932, a large number of theoretical and empirical studies have analyzed the issue of price-induced technological change—many of them on the basis of substitution elasticities. This note compares technologies across space and time on the basis of factual and counterfactual substitution elasticities and argues that differences in estimated substitution elasticities should be decomposed into two counterfactual components. The first component is designed to indicate how the ease of substitution is altered by varied economic circumstances; the second addresses the question of how technologies would compare under genuinely comparable situations. This argument is illustrated by the example of energy-price elasticities of capital before and after the oil crisis of the early 1970s. Since the first statement of Hicks's induced innovation hypothesis in 1932, a large number of theoretical and empirical studies have analyzed the issue of price-induced technological change—many of them on the basis of substitution elasticities. This note compares technologies across space and time on the basis of factual and counterfactual substitution elasticities and argues that differences in estimated substitution elasticities should be decomposed into two counterfactual components. The first component is designed to indicate how the ease of substitution is altered by varied economic circumstances; the second addresses the question of how technologies would compare under genuinely comparable situations. This argument is illustrated by the example of energy-price elasticities of capital before and after the oil crisis of the early 1970s. Since the first statement of Hicks's induced innovation hypothesis in 1932, a large number of theoretical and empirical studies have analyzed the issue of price-induced technological change—many of them on the basis of substitution elasticities. This note compares technologies across space and time on the basis of factual and counterfactual substitution elasticities and argues that differences in estimated substitution elasticities should be decomposed into two counterfactual components. The first component is designed to indicate how the ease of substitution is altered by varied economic circumstances; the second addresses the question of how technologies would compare under genuinely comparable situations. This argument is illustrated by the example of energy-price elasticities of capital before and after the oil crisis of the early 1970s.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rejecting capital–skill complementarity at all costsEconomics Letters, 2003
- Directed Technical ChangeThe Review of Economic Studies, 2002
- The Capital-Energy Controversy: An Artifact of Cost Shares?The Energy Journal, 2002
- Induced Innovation and Energy PricesAmerican Economic Review, 2002
- Raising the Speed Limit: U.S. Economic Growth in the Information AgeBrookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2000
- The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and Energy-Saving Technological ChangeThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999
- On discrimination and the decomposition of wage differentialsJournal of Econometrics, 1994
- A Model of Growth Through Creative DestructionEconometrica, 1992
- Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor MarketsInternational Economic Review, 1973
- Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural EstimatesThe Journal of Human Resources, 1973