Incorporating Equity in Regulatory and Benefit‐Cost Analysis Using Risk‐Based Preferences
- 17 August 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 31 (6), 902-907
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01474.x
Abstract
The analysis of federal regulations focuses on the analysis of economic efficiency through standard benefit-cost analysis in which reductions in risk tend to represent benefits and variability may be investigated through sensitivity or simulation methods. Such analyses typically ignore distributional consequences that can affect decisions. Although analytical guidance from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) mentions distributional consequences, there is little specificity regarding how it might be analyzed. Specificity might be improved by OMB: (1) communicating and enforcing distributional impacts as more central to the process, (2) identifying default types of descriptive distributional statistics, (3) identifying whether legislation has created a constraint to not harm a subgroup, and (4) requesting a distributional sensitivity test of the net benefits along with a standard benefit-cost analysis. Although such actions have a data collection and analysis cost, they may make the results of regulatory analysis more relevant by investigating both efficiency and equity measures.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating Efficiency‐Equality Tradeoffs for Mobile Source Control Strategies in an Urban AreaRisk Analysis, 2008
- The marginal utility of incomeJournal of Public Economics, 2008
- More on the measurement of inequalityThe Journal of Economic Inequality, 2008
- How Well Does the U.S. Government Do Benefit-Cost Analysis?Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2007
- Using the Kaldor‐Hicks tableau format for cost‐benefit analysis and policy evaluationJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2005
- Environmental equity and sustainability: rejecting the Kaldor-Hicks criteriaEcological Economics, 1998
- On the Use of Distributional Weights in Social Cost-Benefit Analysis: Reply to Layard and SquireJournal of Political Economy, 1980
- On the Use of Distributional Weights in Social Cost-Benefit AnalysisJournal of Political Economy, 1980
- On the Use of Distributional Weights in Social Cost-Benefit AnalysisJournal of Political Economy, 1978
- On the measurement of inequalityJournal of Economic Theory, 1970