Technology assessment and resource allocation for predictive genetic testing: A study of the perspectives of Canadian genetic health care providers
Open Access
- 18 June 2009
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Ethics
- Vol. 10 (1), 6
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-10-6
Abstract
Background With a growing number of genetic tests becoming available to the health and consumer markets, genetic health care providers in Canada are faced with the challenge of developing robust decision rules or guidelines to allocate a finite number of public resources. The objective of this study was to gain Canadian genetic health providers' perspectives on factors and criteria that influence and shape resource allocation decisions for publically funded predictive genetic testing in Canada. Methods The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 senior lab directors and clinicians at publically funded Canadian predictive genetic testing facilities. Participants were drawn from British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia. Given the community sampled was identified as being relatively small and challenging to access, purposive sampling coupled with snowball sampling methodologies were utilized. Results Surveyed lab directors and clinicians indicated that predictive genetic tests were funded provincially by one of two predominant funding models, but they themselves played a significant role in how these funds were allocated for specific tests and services. They also rated and identified several factors that influenced allocation decisions and patients' decisions regarding testing. Lastly, participants provided recommendations regarding changes to existing allocation models and showed support for a national evaluation process for predictive testing. Conclusion Our findings suggest that largely local and relatively ad hoc decision making processes are being made in relation to resource allocations for predictive genetic tests and that a more coordinated and, potentially, national approach to allocation decisions in this context may be appropriate.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The wide gap between genetic research and clinical needsCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2007
- Defining the spectrum of genome policyNature Reviews Genetics, 2006
- Genetics as a tool to improve cancer outcomes: ethics and policyNature Reviews Cancer, 2006
- The Challenge of Developing Evidence-Based Genetics Health Care in PracticeFamilial Cancer, 2006
- One of These Things Is Not Like the Others: The Idea of Precedence in Health Technology Assessment and Coverage DecisionsThe Milbank Quarterly, 2005
- GENETIC TESTING IN PRIMARY CAREAnnual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 2004
- Concern for families and individuals in clinical geneticsJournal of Medical Ethics, 2003
- CONFRONTING THE “GRAY ZONES” OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: EVALUATING GENETIC TESTING SERVICES FOR PUBLIC INSURANCE COVERAGE IN CANADAInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2003
- The complexities of predictive genetic testingBMJ, 2001
- Translating Technology Assessment Into Policy: Conceptual Issues and Tough ChoicesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1992